Illustrated figures building a shared shape together

Nothing Broken, Room to Grow: How Established Leadership Teams Evolve

New teams get the attention. Everyone expects them to need time to settle.

Established teams are assumed to be fine. They know each other and have ways of working that got them here. But history brings patterns, and some have become so familiar that nobody notices them.

Here's what I see when I coach established leadership teams.

Whose voice fills the room?

Most established teams are a mix of long-serving members and newer ones.

There's also a natural order of rank and title. The voice that carries most weight belongs to whoever holds the most rank, whether that comes from job title or time served. Without anyone meaning it to, that voice becomes the team's voice. Newer perspectives go unsaid.

This is the difference between team facilitation and systems coaching. Facilitation makes sure everyone gets a turn to speak. Systems coaching listens for what the team isn't saying, and brings in the voices it didn't know it was holding back. When those voices are heard, the team gets information it's been missing.

Agreed, but not done

You'll know this one. An action gets agreed. Nothing happens. A month later, the same conversation comes round again.

It's usually treated as a planning problem. Sometimes it is. More often, something is stopping people from committing. Maybe loyalty to their own team comes first. Maybe they disagreed and didn't say so.

The question isn't really about why it didn't get done. It's about what's making it hard to commit to. That's where the real conversation is.

Systems coaching works with those blockers. It moves a team from norming to high performing, not with another list of actions, but with a shared commitment to new rhythms for how it works together. When a team can be honest about what's getting in the way, it moves from getting along to getting things done.

Every team has its own character

Along the way, the team learns about each other and about itself as a group.

Think of mixing paint. Each person adds their colour, and together they make a shade none of them would make alone. It isn't about skills or strengths. It's the character of that group. Change one person and the shade shifts.

That character shapes what the team needs. Water a cactus like a fern and it won't thrive. The care isn't bad. It's the wrong care.

Teams are the same. A team that comes alive through debate will be drained by long consensus workshops. A reflective team will feel steamrollered by a fast-paced away day. What worked for another team, or for this team five years ago, may not fit who it is now.

Once a team knows its character, it can choose ways of working that suit it.

History is an asset, once you can see it

Established teams rarely need fixing. They need a clearer view of the patterns they've built, and the chance to decide which ones still serve them.

Their history is a strength. It works harder once the team can see it.

That's what systems coaching helps teams reveal: the stuff that needs to be out in the open, so the team can work with it rather than around it.

← Back to Reflections